N-SCAN Track Settings
 
N-SCAN Gene Predictions   (All Genes and Gene Predictions tracks)

Display mode:       Reset to defaults

Color track by codons: Help on codon coloring

Show codon numbering:

Display data as a density graph:

List subtracks: only selected/visible    all  
hide
 Configure
 N-SCAN+EST  N-SCAN+EST Gene Predictions   Data format 
hide
 Configure
 N-SCAN  N-SCAN Gene Predictions   Data format 
Assembly: Human May 2004 (NCBI35/hg17)

Description

N-SCAN and N-SCAN EST gene predictions.

Methods

N-SCAN

N-SCAN combines biological-signal modeling in the target genome sequence along with information from a multiple-genome alignment to generate de novo gene predictions. It extends the TWINSCAN target-informant genome pair to allow for an arbitrary number of informant sequences as well as richer models of sequence evolution. It models the phylogenetic relationships between the aligned genome sequences, context-dependent substitution rates, insertions, and deletions.

Human N-SCAN uses mouse (mm5) as the informant and iterative pseudogene masking.

N-SCAN EST

N-SCAN EST combines EST alignments into N-SCAN. Similar to the conservation sequence models in TWINSCAN, separate probability models are developed for EST alignments to genomic sequence in exons, introns, splice sites and UTRs, reflecting the EST alignment patterns in these regions. N-SCAN EST is more accurate than N-SCAN while retaining the ability to discover novel genes to which no ESTs align.

Human N-SCAN EST uses mouse (mm5), rat (rn3), and chicken (galGal2) as informants.

Credits

Thanks to Michael Brent's Computational Genomics Group at Washington University St. Louis for providing this data.

Special thanks for this implementation of N-SCAN to Aaron Tenney in the Brent lab, and Robert Zimmermann, currently at Max F. Perutz Laboratories in Vienna, Austria.

References

Gross SS, Brent MR. Using multiple alignments to improve gene prediction. In Proc. 9th Int'l Conf. on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB '05):374-388 and J Comput Biol. 2006 Mar;13(2):379-93.

Korf I, Flicek P, Duan D, Brent MR. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics. 2001 Jun 1;17(90001)S140-8.

van Baren MJ, Brent MR. Iterative gene prediction and pseudogene removal improves genome annotation. Genome Res. 2006 May;16(5):678-85.